Combined pars plana vitrectomy and suture less scleral fixation of foldable intraocular lens: single surgery visual rehabilitation of dislocated lens/intraocular lens

Introduction

Combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and scleral fixation of rigid intraocular lens (IOL) has been described previously for closed globe injury sequelae. However, it was often associated with vision threatening complications (1). While micro invasive vitrectomy systems (MIVS) have revolutionized PPV in a major way, scleral fixation of IOL (SFIOL) surgery has also had its share of advancements (2). Lens related complications are a common indication for vitreo-retinal intervention and as current literature supports, both SFIOL and PPV are safe and visually rewarding techniques. Hence, combining the two surgeries as a single step procedure becomes an obvious step towards visual restoration.

In our study we describe the successful management of lens related posterior segment complications with combined PPV and SFIOL using MIVS instruments. We herein discuss the surgical aspects of our technique along with complications encountered during and after surgery.

Methods

The study conformed to the tenets of declaration of Helsinki. This was a retrospective analysis of records for 11 patients undergoing combined PPV and SFIOL surgery at a tertiary eye care centre of Northern India. Out of the 11 eyes operated upon, 5 patients had posterior dislocation of lens/lens fragments (3 following complicated cataract surgery, 1 following trauma, 1 in a case of Marfan’s syndrome), 1 had an epi retinal membrane (ERM) and 5 had posterior dislocation of IOL (4 following complicated cataract surgery, 1 following trauma).

Surgical technique

All surgeries were performed by a single surgeon (Brijesh Takkar) with the same machine CONSTELLATION^® Vision System (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA) using 25 G instruments. Two patients required intravitreal phacoemulsification and underwent 23 G vitrectomy.

Scleral pockets

Peribulbar anesthesia was administered to all patients using 5 mL lignocaine hydrochloride 2.0% and 5 mL bupivacaine hydrochloride 0.5%. A superior approach was used for performing the surgery. After a localized peritomy was done at 3 o’clock and 9 o’clock position, the sclera was marked with the help of gentian violet at 1.5 and 3.0 mm from the limbus. Two partial-thickness parallel radial scleral incisions were made between the two marks. A lamellar dissection was then performed between the two incisions with the help of crescent blade to raise a partial-thickness scleral flap (Figure 1A). Bleeding vessels were cauterized and 1 mm tunnels were made perpendicular to the small edge of the rectangle centrally with a 26 G needle (Figure 1B) on both sides, orientation of tunnels aligned to proposed placement of haptics of the IOL.

Figure 1 Surgical steps. (A) Partial thickness scleral flap being raised with a crescent knife after local peritomy; (B) bent 26 G needle being used for creating a “pocket” tunnel for final placement of intraocular lens (IOL) haptic; (C) a 25 G infusion port created away from the scleral flap; (D) conventional vitrectomy being performed for dislocated lens; (E) a scleral incision being made in the bed of the scleral flap with 23 G MVR; (F) partially injected foldable three piece IOL. The tip of leading haptic grasped with a serrated 25 G forceps. The assistant is holding the scleral flap; (G) both the haptics have been externalized. IOL is centered; (H) haptic being tucked into scleral “pocket” tunnel. The IOL is temporarily decentered and the assistant is holding the other haptic fixed with Mcpherson forceps.

PPV

Next conventional 25 G PPV was performed placing the vitrectomy ports away from the scleral flaps (Figure 1C,D). The infusion cannula was placed inferotemporally. For dislocated IOL, the IOL was grasped at the optic-haptic junction with end grasping forceps, and delivered through a limbus based incision. The dropped IOL was repositioned in one case. For dropped lens, phaco fragmentation was performed using linear ultrasound power. Perfluorocarbon liquid was used in all the cases to protect the posterior pole and for easier surgical manipulation. Ports were then plugged for implanting the IOL.

SFIOL

Two sclerotomies were then made with a 23 G microvitreoretinal blade (Alcon, Fort Worth, Texas, USA), one each in the bed of the flap, 1.5 mm from limbus (Figure 1E). A 3.2 mm incision was made at 12 o’ clock with the help of a keratome and a three piece foldable IOL (AcrySof MA60AC, Alcon Laboratories) was introduced into the anterior chamber with the IOL shooter keeping the trailing haptic out of the anterior chamber. The leading haptic of the IOL was guided into the serrated tip of the end gripping 25 G intravitreal forceps and externalized out through the left sclerotomy (Figure 1F). The trailing haptic was then pushed inside the eye with the help of McPherson forceps and similarly externalized out of the eye through the right sclerotomy (Figure 1G). The tips of the haptics were then secured into the dissected scleral tunnel (Figure 1H). Fluid air exchange was done and the retinal periphery was screened in all the cases. Scleral flaps were then sutured. The vitrectomy port sites were sutured only when leaking, else they were left sutureless. The conjunctival flaps were also sutured. Intraoperative and post-operative complications were managed as necessary (Table 1). Figures provided are those from surgery of case 1.

IOL centration

The IOL centration was checked clinically. Intraoperatively, the coaxial light from the microscope was used to form Purkinje images on the cornea and the IOL after re pressurizing the eye. The first primary and the third Purkinje images, from the anterior corneal and anterior surface of IOL respectively, were checked for alignment. This ensured that the IOL was well centred and is a better method than relying on an estimate of the centre of the cornea or of the pupil, both of which may be skewed away from the true visual axis. Post-operatively, pupil was fully dilated and the distance between the posterior surface of iris and the nasal and temporal edges of the optic was noted to identify the tilt of the IOL. Also, the distance between the nasal and temporal edges of the optic and the respective limbus were noted in the fully dilated pupil to identify discrepancy between the two, giving a fair estimate of the amount and the direction of IOL decentration.

Follow-up and analysis

All patients had a minimum follow-up of 6 months. They were evaluated after the surgery at day 1, day 7, day 30 and monthly thereafter. At each follow-up, visual acuity, intraocular pressure, centration of IOL and retinal status was evaluated. While collecting the data, emphasis was given to visual results and complications noted during or after the surgery. Macular edema was assessed with spectral domain optical coherence tomography (Cirrus; Zeiss Meditec, Inc., Dublin, CA, USA) at each visit. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft excel data sheets and SPSS software (version: 16). Paired t-test was used for analysis of visual acuity in logMAR units.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 43.36±15.12 years (range, 22–64 years). Eight out of 11 patients were male. Mean baseline best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.78±0.63 logMAR units while the mean post-operative BCVA at 3 months follow-up was 0.37±0.29 logMAR units, the visual gain being statistically significant (P=0.021). None of the patients had a drop in BCVA with nine patients having final BCVA better than 0.48 logMAR units. Details of the patients have been presented in Table 1. The operative time ranged from 75–90 minutes in the 11 patients.

Apart from case 10, all the patients had attained their final BCVA by 1 month of follow-up. The visual acuity remained stable till the six monthly follow-up in all the patients and the mean BCVA was same as at 3 months, 0.37±0.29 logMAR units. In case 10, the gain in visual acuity was slow due to slow resolution of macular edema following removal of a dense ERM (Table 1). The central macular thickness (CMT) was also stable in all the patients apart form case 10. In this patient the pre-operative BCVA was 1.3 logMAR units while the baseline CMT was 420 µm. This patient received topical nepafenac post operatively and had BCVA of 1 logMAR units and CMT of 360 µm at 1 monthly follow-up. By the third monthly follow-up, the BCVA had improved to 0.48 logMAR units while CMT had come down to 290 µm. The patient remained stable thereafter in follow-up.

Only one patient (case 1) had ocular hypertension after surgery, while IOP was within normal limits in all the patients after 1 week of surgery till the final follow-up. The most common complication during surgery was retinal break formation, noted in two patients. In case 1 it occurred at the edge of lattice degeneration during induction of vitreous detachment while in case 7 it was noted after placement of IOL. The most common post-operative complication was choroidal detachment (CD), noted in three patients. Intraoperative miosis was noted in two patients, both established cases of Marfan’s syndrome. Reversible corneal edema and cystoid macular edema were noted in one case each. The IOL was stable in all the patients at final follow-up. IOL haptic breakage or late decentration or IOL tilt were not encountered in any case.

Discussion

Posterior dislocation of lens and IOL has numerous causes, like iatrogenic, traumatic and spontaneous dislocation, requiring vitrectomy and placement of IOL for visual restoration (1,3). Such situations, often occur in young or middle aged patients, warranting placement of a SFIOL or an anterior chamber IOL (ACIOL). The major long-term complications associated with SFIOL are either retinal (4) or suture related (5,6). Complications are more commonly seen in primary implantation of SFIOL during cataract surgery as compared to secondary rehabilitation (4,7). These findings are partially due to incomplete anterior vitrectomy (6) in primary surgery leading to vitreous traction. Secondary implantation of SFIOL in vitrectomized eyes has been reported to be safe (8). As our technique involves complete vitrectomy, anterior and posterior, along with sutureless IOL fixation, aforementioned complications are not expected to occur. Despite our attempt to complete the vitrectomy, case 7 had a retinal hole with localized retinal detachment noted after placement of the IOL during screening of retinal periphery. It was managed with endolaser and gas injection. As our surgical protocol involved retinal periphery examination after IOL fixation, long term catastrophic effects of such complications were minimized. The ability to thoroughly evaluate the retinal periphery immediately after IOL placement is therefore an advantage of combined PPV and SFIOL approach.

Although we did not encounter dropped IOL while attempting scleral fixation, it could have been easily managed as in case 8 which underwent IOL repositioning (9). This patient had a dropped three pieces foldable IOL following complicated cataract surgery. The surgical technique was same as described above till complete vitrectomy after which perfluoro carbon liquid was injected and the IOL was levitated. The tip of the haptic was gripped with forceps inserted through one of the MVR incisions beneath the scleral flap and externalized and gripped by the assistant. The second haptic was then externalized in a similar fashion. Heavy liquid was removed and the surgery was carried out routinely. Therefore, the ability to reposition and manage “dropped SFIOL” is another major advantage of our technique.

As the surgery is long and can lead to pigment dispersion, we expected ocular hypertension and uveitis in follow-up period (10). However, only one patient, case 1, developed raised IOP (well controlled on medication). This patient had previously documented angle recession with borderline IOP (22 mmHg) in the eye undergoing surgery. Also as gas was injected, the mobile gas bubble could have increased pigment dispersion. This was the only patient in whom corneal edema persisted beyond 3 days. After a month, IOP was well controlled on topical mono therapy with timolol 0.5% and resolution of corneal edema.

The most common post-operative complication noted was CD (11,12). We believe that this is the most important concern with the combined approach. The reason for the same could have been leaking scleral flaps or sclerotomies and inadvertent full thickness scleral perforation during lamellar dissection which went unnoticed. The three patients with CD had slightly low IOP on the first post-operative day (6–10 mmHg) without any evidence of leak on Seidels test. All the three patients received intensive topical steroids and peribulbar steroid injections. In no patient CD persisted beyond 1 week, IOP became normal by the seventh day and no patient required a repeat procedure. This was anticipated pre operatively hence fluid air exchange was done in all the patients. Intraoperative IOP fluctuations can also be the cause and should be controlled.

A previous study on combination of PPV and sutured SFIOL found very high rates of secondary corrective procedures, ~50%, commonly related to haptic breakage (13). Another similar study on 63 eyes found up to 20% late complications, which included two cases of IOL dislocation due to suture breakage (11). A recent study on PPV followed by secondary IOL placement found ERM to occur more commonly after ACIOL placement as compared to sutured SFIOL (14). However the technique of SFIOL has now evolved, with studies showing good results with suture less tucking of the haptics in scleral tunnels (15). In fact if the design of the dropped IOL is suitable, it may be repositioned with or without glue instead of performing an exchange, giving the advantage of lesser surgically induced astigmatism (16,17). In this regard, there have been reports of successful scleral fixation of single piece as well as toric IOLs (18). In our series, however, only one dropped IOL was suitable for repositioning and in others IOL exchange was performed through limbus.

With the combined approach, a need for second surgery is avoided. We did not encounter any IOL decentration. However, there are a few limitations of this technique. First the learning curve is steep. Managing IOP and anterior chamber depth during surgery is particularly challenging. Dependence on a trained assistant to prevent IOL dislocation during attempted scleral fixation is another limitation. Assessment of corneal endothelial cell counts, larger number of patients and longer follow-ups would help in confirming the results and refining the surgery as well. There was no comparative group in our study as it would have become a multiple surgeon study. The technique maybe made completely suture less by avoiding scleral flaps and peritomy all together and placing the haptics of the IOL beneath the conjunctiva (unpublished reports). Large sample sized studies would increase the evidence for the appropriate use of this technique.

Hence combined PPV and SFIOL is an efficacious procedure for managing IOL/lens dislocation and aphakia in a single surgery. While there are no serious long term adverse effects, post-operative short lasting CD is common with no harmful effect on final visual acuity. Other possible complications include intraoperative retinal break, reversible corneal edema and reversible ocular hypertension.

Acknowledgments

Funding: None.

Footnote

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/aes.2016.12.07). RA served as the unpaid editorial board member of Annals of Eye Science. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethical Statement: The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). Our study was regarding a routine procedure done for management and rehabilitation of aphakes and also retrospective in nature, we had not taken IRB approval. However consent was taken from each patient after explaining the benefits and risks involving the surgery.

Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

References

1. Chaudhry NA, Belfort A, Flynn HW Jr, et al. Combined lensectomy, vitrectomy and scleral fixation of intraocular lens implant after closed-globe injury. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999;30:375-81. [PubMed]
2. Long C, Wei Y, Yuan Z, et al. Modified technique for transscleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. BMC Ophthalmol 2015;15:127. [Crossref] [PubMed]
3. Takkar B, Mahajan D, Azad S, et al. Spontaneous posterior capsular rupture with lens dislocation in pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Semin Ophthalmol 2013;28:236-8. [Crossref] [PubMed]
4. Lee JG, Lee JH, Chung H. Factors contributing to retinal detachment after transscleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:697-702. [Crossref] [PubMed]
5. Luk AS, Young AL, Cheng LL. Long-term outcome of scleral-fixated intraocular lens implantation. Br J Ophthalmol 2013;97:1308-11. [Crossref] [PubMed]
6. Kanigowska K, Grałek M, Karczmarewicz B. Transsclerally fixated intraocular artificial lenses in children--analysis of long-term postoperative complications. Klin Oczna 2007;109:283-6. [PubMed]
7. Lee VY, Yuen HK, Kwok AK. Comparison of outcomes of primary and secondary implantation of scleral fixated posterior chamber intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:1459-62. [Crossref] [PubMed]
8. Ahn JK, Yu HG, Chung H, et al. Transscleral fixation of a foldable intraocular lens in aphakic vitrectomized eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:2390-6. [Crossref] [PubMed]
9. Nadal J, Kudsieh B, Casaroli-Marano RP. Scleral Fixation of Posteriorly Dislocated Intraocular Lenses by 23-Gauge Vitrectomy without Anterior Segment Approach. J Ophthalmol 2015;2015:391619 [Crossref] [PubMed]
10. McAllister AS, Hirst LW. Visual outcomes and complications of scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37:1263-9. [Crossref] [PubMed]
11. Bading G, Hillenkamp J, Sachs HG, et al. Long-term safety and functional outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral-fixated sutured posterior chamber lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144:371-7. [Crossref] [PubMed]
12. Asadi R, Kheirkhah A. Long-term results of scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses in children. Ophthalmology 2008;115:67-72. [Crossref] [PubMed]
13. Vote BJ, Tranos P, Bunce C, et al. Long-term outcome of combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral fixated sutured posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;141:308-12. [Crossref] [PubMed]
14. Melamud A, Topilow JS, Cai L, et al. Pars Plana Vitrectomy Combined With Either Secondary Scleral-Fixated or Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens Implantation. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;168:177-82. [Crossref] [PubMed]
15. Kawaji T, Sato T, Tanihara H. Sutureless intrascleral intraocular lens fixation with lamellar dissection of scleral tunnel. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:227-31. [Crossref] [PubMed]
16. Oh SY, Lee SJ, Park JM. Comparision of surgical outcomes of intraocular lens refixation and intraocular lens exchange with perfluorocarbon liquid and fibrin glue-assisted sutureless scleral fixation. Eye (Lond) 2015;29:757-63. [Crossref] [PubMed]
17. Eum SJ, Kim MJ, Kim HK. A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Dislocated Intraocular Lens Fixation between In Situ Refixation and Conventional Exchange Technique Combined with Vitrectomy. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016:5942687 [Crossref] [PubMed]
18. Kelkar A, Shah R, Kelkar J, et al. Sutureless, Glueless, Scleral Fixation of Single-Piece and Toric Intraocular Lens: A Novel Technique. Case Rep Ophthalmol 2015;6:239-45. [Crossref] [PubMed]